%0 Articles
%T Forestscapes – a forest landscape typology as an integrated planning process tool
%A Komulainen, Minna
%D 2010
%J Dissertationes Forestales
%V 2010
%N 98
%R doi:10.14214/df.98
%U http://dissertationesforestales.fi/article/1880
%X The purpose of the study was to find forest landscape qualities, which are essential to landscape development and its critical success factors. Are there special landscape character types, with such unifying qualities, as to be considered similar types, and distinguishable from other types? What are the qualities, preferred management alternatives and visual problems caused by forestry? The study was based on eight case studies of nationally valuable landscape areas in different landscape regions in Finland. The case study areas were Ruissalo, Koli, Melalahti, Häntälä, Peränne, Naapurinvaara, Vuokatti and Tipasoja. The preference studies related to the planning processes showed the differences in perception of landscape types, namely in their sensitivity to change and visual appearances depending on the location of operations in the landscape. Thus the characteristics of the forest spatial structure were described and classified into various forest landscape types. The assessment of case study areas distinguished eleven forest landscape types to consider in forest planning and landscape management practices. The highest parts of the landscape were often summit forests, followed by slope forests and edges. The edge often presented a high variation in forms of cultural landscape edges, pasturelands, road edges and swamps. It was a zone of extensive and versatile cultural and natural activity. The lowest level of the landscape included the types of valley with small woods and tree groups and shores, divided into cultural, natural shores and islands. In the comparison of location of types between the case study areas, some forest landscape types were found to exist in one particular location (stable types), while some types varied in their location (variable types). The stable types were summit forest, slope forest, edge, valley and shores, while the location of variable types of pasturelands and swamps seemed to largely depend on the regional landscape structure and land use. In order to find management alternatives, the professional analysis of case study areas was combined with preference studies and the landscape management recommendations suggested for each forest landscape type. The applied landscape structure theory was useful in distinguishing structural and spatial differences in forest landscape. The results from the eight case study areas show that the differences in landscape types can be identified and observed with an applied planning method and how forest management could be adjusted to comply with their special characteristics. The examined typology could be an instrument for developing sustainable management strategies and a framework for planning cultural forest landscapes, in order to identify their sensitivity, character, and sustainable actions for each landscape type.